Candidate resource

Forward Deployed Engineer Readiness Scorecard + 90-Day Skill Map

Score each dimension from 0 to 3: 0 means no evidence yet, 1 means guided practice, 2 means independent practice, and 3 means repeated evidence in real delivery.

Six dimensionsEvidence-based scoringOne 90-day plan

Part 01 · Score yourself

Do not score confidence. Score evidence.

For every rating above zero, write the project, artifact, decision, or result that supports it.

01

Workflow discovery

Can you observe real work, ask useful questions, map exceptions, and define an outcome before choosing a tool?

0 · none1 · guided2 · independent3 · repeated
02

Technical implementation

Can you build, integrate, test, instrument, debug, document, and operate a complete workflow?

0 · none1 · guided2 · independent3 · repeated
03

AI and software judgment

Can you explain when to use an agent, deterministic logic, an integration, a human decision, or no new technology?

0 · none1 · guided2 · independent3 · repeated
04

Data and governance

Can you handle permissions, sources, privacy, testing, change control, incidents, and evidence responsibly?

0 · none1 · guided2 · independent3 · repeated
05

Client communication

Can you write clearly, run a working session, explain tradeoffs, surface risk, and confirm decisions?

0 · none1 · guided2 · independent3 · repeated
06

Delivery ownership

Can you manage scope, next actions, acceptance criteria, quality, handoff, and the operating measure after launch?

0 · none1 · guided2 · independent3 · repeated

Part 02 · Build the next 90 days

One proof-producing cycle.

Days 01 to 30

Foundation

Choose one role direction, close the highest-risk technical gap, practice workflow discovery, and create one small end-to-end system with tests and documentation.

Role map · lab · reflection
Days 31 to 60

Simulation

Work from a realistic brief with changing requirements, a stakeholder review, data and access boundaries, acceptance criteria, and a recorded demo.

Brief · build · demo
Days 61 to 90

Delivery evidence

Contribute to a supervised project or credible practicum, then document the problem, decisions, contribution, controls, result, and lessons without exposing client information.

Artifact · case narrative · next gap

Portfolio evidence

Show how you think and deliver.

Problem

What was happening?

Explain the user, workflow, constraint, consequence, and evidence that change was needed.

Decision

Why this design?

Show the tradeoffs between people, software, agents, integrations, data, controls, time, and cost.

Contribution

What did you own?

Separate your work from the team’s work and identify the artifacts you produced.

Proof

How was it accepted?

Use tests, reviews, operating measures, user feedback, or documented delivery evidence, not inflated claims.

Use the scorecard to choose your next proof, not your next badge.

Return to the candidate page to join the network or update AIthical.Pro when you have stronger evidence.

Return to the candidate network
Book a strategy call